Many people consider that by running linux, you're in a more secure environment than if you're running other operating systems. I take the view that the amount of effort that's expended in attacking a particular system is directly related to the potential return. As linux is both relatively uncommon, and comes in many different flavours, it's a hard target - so why bother? However, this 'security through obscurity' approach becomes less and less valid with the increasing popularity of linux. We feel that it's far better to take security seriously, than be caught napping.

We can offer an audit of existing platforms, reporting and making recommendations. If you wish we can take it further, attacking your servers to see how they hold up.